top of page

Hemp vs Soybeans: The Future of US Farming Amid "Farmageddon"

  • Writer: Pac Garden Assets
    Pac Garden Assets
  • Oct 4
  • 4 min read
Split image: fields of soybeans labeled ‘Soybeans aren't the future’ transitioning to fields of hemp and processing plants — symbolizing a pivot from export dependence to domestic hemp infrastructure.
‘Farmageddon’ is here as China snubs US soybeans amid the ongoing trade war. Can hemp be the solution US farmers need? Yes!

Soy farmers face collapse as China buys zero U.S. soybeans, but a pivot to hemp could reboot rural economies and insulate America from trade shocks.


The Soy Crisis Unmasked

American soybean farmers are reeling. China — historically the largest buyer of U.S. soy — has bought zero American soybeans this year due to tariffs and trade retaliation (MarketWatch). This abrupt cutoff has caused farms to hold huge inventory surpluses, depressed prices, and pushed many operators to the brink of bankruptcy (Yahoo Finance).


A driver behind this collapse: U.S. soy exports to China once accounted for as much as 50-60% of all soy exported from the U.S. (Reuters).  Now, with no buyers, traditional farm incomes evaporate overnight (farmdoc daily).


Add in high input costs, debt burdens, and reduced alternative markets, and many see this not just as a bad year — but as a structural crisis. Congress and the USDA are scrambling with bailout talks, but those are temporary patches, not long-term solutions.


Hemp vs Soybeans: The Future of US Farming and Why this is the Way


Rather than relying on unstable export markets, U.S. agriculture could pivot to industrial hemp — a versatile, value-added crop whose byproducts serve multiple industries (textiles, bioplastics, CBD, building materials).


Hemp isn’t a new idea for farmers: even before this crisis, growers in states like Kansas were investigating it as a hedge during Chinese trade volatility (Reuters). Under the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp was removed from the DEA’s Schedule I status, making it a federally recognized agricultural commodity (so long as THC remains under 0.3%) (Wikipedia).


Switching just 20-50% of soybean acreage to hemp could generate a domestic hemp infrastructure: processing plants, textiles, extraction facilities, food products, and more. This shift would anchor value processing inside the U.S. rather than exporting raw crops.


The Economics of Transition


What would a hemp pivot look like in practice? Let’s break it down:


  • Crop compatibility & equipment reuse: Many farmers already have drying barns, fertilizer systems, and harvesting machinery that can be adapted for hemp.

  • Incremental yield conversions: On average, hemp yields may vary (fiber, grain, CBD) depending on genetics and location. Cannabinoid hemp might yield less biomass than bulk fiber, but value per pound can be much higher.

  • Processing & logistics investment: Success hinges on local processing hubs (decanters, extractors, fiber mills) to reduce transport costs.

  • Market access & regulation: States must permit hemp cultivation, approve processing licenses, and ensure links to regulated end-use markets (e.g. textiles, food, building materials).

  • Financing & risk: Transitioning farmers will need capital, insurance, and risk support — especially early years.


If, say, 30% of U.S. soybean acreage (millions of acres) switched to hemp, it would immediately create demand for processing capacity, seed suppliers, infrastructure, and a vast supply chain. This could support tens of thousands of new jobs and decrease reliance on commodity export markets.


Barriers, Risks, and Policy Challenges


The road to hemp transformation isn’t easy:


  • Regulatory uncertainty: Though hemp is federally legal, states interpret laws differently. Some states restrict THC, licensing, or transfers.

  • Capital & credit access: Hemp operators often face similar banking and debt restrictions as cannabis — making early funding harder.

  • Market saturation & pricing risk: If too many farmers pivot at once, supply gluts can crash prices.

  • Soil & agronomy knowledge gaps: Hemp has different nutrient, water, and pest profiles; farmers will need extension support.

  • Political resistance: Some regions and politicians oppose cannabis/hemp associations, even for industrial hemp.


To overcome these, proactive federal and state policies are needed: tax incentives, infrastructure grants, processing zone designations, crop insurance, and credit access.


Roadmap for a Hemp-Fuelled Agricultural Rescue


Here’s a 5-step roadmap for stakeholders:


  1. Pilot zones & grants — designate regions for accelerated hemp development (e.g. southern Midwest)

  2. Processing grants & PPPs — subsidize building extraction, fiber, and food processing hubs

  3. Crop insurance & loan programs — tailor risk mitigation tools for hemp transitions

  4. Supply chain development — link seeds, logistics, fiber conversion, and markets

  5. Education & extension — train farmers, build best practices, share agronomy data


For those investors wanting a head start: PacGarden is already identifying properties near hemp potential corridors. We can assist with sourcing or consulting to help farmers and operators make this shift.


From Soy Slump to Hemp Surge


Hemp vs Soybeans: The Future of US Farming is made crystal cleat as the trade war has laid bare the fragility of commodity export dependence. Farmers are begging for bailouts — we believe the real bailout is value creation at home through hemp.


Redirecting even a portion of soybean acreage into hemp unlocks processing, jobs, land value, and resilience against external shocks. It’s not a silver bullet — but with investment, policy alignment, and strategic planning, hemp could be the lifeline U.S. agriculture so desperately needs.


FAQ Section


Q1: Why is soy export collapse so severe now?China, once the world’s largest buyer of U.S. soybeans, has slashed purchases due to tariffs and is sourcing from Brazil instead, leaving U.S. farmers bereft and overstocked (Financial Times)


Q2: What regulation allows hemp farming in the U.S.?The 2018 Farm Bill removed hemp (≤0.3% THC) from DEA Schedule I, classifying it as an agricultural commodity under USDA oversight (Wikipedia).


Q3: Has any U.S. farmer tried switching to hemp?Yes — even before this crisis, in states like Kansas and others, farmers began experimenting with hemp amid low crop prices (Reuters).


Q4: What happens if all farmers pivot to hemp?That’s unlikely — but if a significant share of acreage pivots, it forces scale in processing, raises land value, and builds a domestic hemp economy less dependent on international trade.


Q5: What’s the biggest barrier to this transformation?Major risks include regulatory uncertainty, lack of capital access, knowledge gaps in cultivation, and potential oversupply. Supportive policy and investment will be critical.

Comments


bottom of page